Key points
- The Michigan Constitution provides that no person shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.[1]
- Miranda warnings are tied to custodial interrogation: questioning initiated by officers after a person has been taken into custody or otherwise deprived of freedom of action in any significant way.[2]
- Volunteered statements are not barred by the Fifth Amendment, and a party's own statement offered against that party is not hearsay under the Michigan Rules of Evidence.[3][4]
- An interrogation of a person in custodial detention about a major felony, a term that includes third-degree criminal sexual conduct, must be recorded in full on time-stamped audio and video.[5][6]
- If a person in custody states that he or she wants an attorney, the interrogation must cease until an attorney is present.[7]
A call from a detective about a sexual misconduct allegation is a request, and the law gives the person called a set of rights that exist whether or not a charge is ever filed. The Michigan Constitution provides that no person shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.[1] Miranda warnings, by contrast, are tied to custodial interrogation, and the opinion says general questioning of citizens in the fact-finding process is not affected by its holding.[2][3]
This page sets out those rights and the rules that govern police questioning. It describes the law. It does not suggest what anyone should say or not say; that is a question for a lawyer who knows the facts, and Do you need a lawyer before charges are filed? explains how people find one at this stage.
What a detective's call is, legally
Before a charge, a detective is collecting information for a file that will go to the prosecuting attorney. By statute a warrant or summons for anything other than a minor offense may not issue unless a written authorization signed by the prosecuting attorney is filed, or unless security for costs is filed.[8] The U.S. Supreme Court has said prosecutors are under no duty to file charges as soon as probable cause exists but before they are satisfied they can establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.[9]
The statutes reviewed for this guide impose no duty on police to tell a person that an investigation is open or what the allegation is. Children's Protective Services works under a different rule: a department investigator who contacts a person about whom a report has been made must give his or her name, say whom he or she represents, and state the specific complaints or allegations made against that person.[10] The two kinds of investigation can run together, as CPS investigations of sexual abuse explains.
The right against self-incrimination
The Michigan Constitution's text is short: "No person shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself."[1] The federal Fifth Amendment privilege is the one the U.S. Supreme Court protected in Miranda v Arizona, which bars the prosecution from using statements stemming from custodial interrogation unless procedural safeguards were used.[2]
The same opinion draws a line. Volunteered statements of any kind are not barred by the Fifth Amendment, and their admissibility is not affected by the holding.[3]
When Miranda warnings are required, and when they are not
Miranda defined custodial interrogation as "questioning initiated by law enforcement officers after a person has been taken into custody or otherwise deprived of his freedom of action in any significant way."[2] Both parts matter: custody, and interrogation.
| Setting | What Miranda says |
|---|---|
| Questioning after a person has been taken into custody or otherwise significantly deprived of freedom of action | The four warnings are owed before any questioning.[2][11] |
| General on-the-scene questioning, or other general questioning of citizens in the fact-finding process | Not affected by the holding.[3] |
| A statement a person volunteers | Not barred by the Fifth Amendment.[3] |
The four warnings are that the person has the right to remain silent, that anything said can be used against him or her in a court of law, that he or she has the right to the presence of an attorney, and that an attorney will be appointed before questioning if he or she cannot afford one and wants one.[11]
Where a phone call, a conversation at a front door, or an interview a person drove to falls on that line is not answered by a statute. A court decides whether a given interview was custodial on the facts of that interview. A common misstatement is that a case "gets thrown out" if rights were never read. Miranda's own rule is narrower: it limits the prosecution's use of statements stemming from custodial interrogation.[2]
What happens once a person in custody invokes a right
Miranda also describes what follows the warnings. If the individual indicates in any manner, at any time before or during questioning, that he or she wishes to remain silent, the interrogation must cease.[7] If the individual states that he or she wants an attorney, the interrogation must cease until an attorney is present, and the individual must have an opportunity to confer with the attorney and to have the attorney present during any later questioning.[7]
Those passages concern a person in custody.[7] Later decisions about how an invocation is expressed were not reviewed for this guide and are not described here.
The right to a lawyer
Two different sources of law use the word "counsel." Miranda's warning concerns the presence of an attorney during custodial questioning.[11] The Michigan Constitution gives the accused "in every criminal prosecution" the right to have the assistance of counsel for his or her defense.[12]
Nothing in either source prevents a person from consulting or hiring a lawyer before any charge exists. Neither source, as quoted here, states a right to a court-appointed lawyer for a person who has not been charged and is not in custody: Miranda's appointment warning is one of the warnings owed before custodial questioning, and the constitutional text speaks of "the accused" in a "criminal prosecution."[11][12] When the right to counsel attaches was not researched for this guide. How appointed counsel works once a case is filed is covered in the sister guide's page on the right to a lawyer.
Statements are evidence
Under the Michigan Rules of Evidence, a statement offered against an opposing party that was made by that party in an individual capacity is not hearsay.[4] In a criminal case the defendant is a party, so the hearsay rule does not keep out the defendant's own words when the prosecution offers them.
That rule is about hearsay only. It does not say every statement comes in; relevance rules and the constitutional rules above still apply. How texts and messages are treated is covered in Texts, apps and digital evidence. Conversations recorded by the other person or at police direction are covered in Recorded "pretext" calls and messages.
Michigan's interrogation-recording law
Since March 28, 2013, Michigan has had a recording statute for serious felonies.[6] A law enforcement official interrogating an individual in custodial detention about the individual's involvement in a major felony must make a time-stamped, audiovisual recording of the entire interrogation, including the notification of Miranda rights.[5] The section applies if the agency has audiovisual recording equipment that is operational or accessible as the statute provides, or once time periods set elsewhere in the chapter have expired, whichever occurs first.[13]
- Which offenses. A "major felony" is a felony punishable by imprisonment for life, for life or any term of years, or for a statutory maximum of 20 years or more, or a violation of the third-degree criminal sexual conduct statute.[6] The penalty for each degree is in the penalties chart.
- Which settings. "Custodial detention" means being in a place of detention because an official has told the individual he or she is under arrest, or because the individual reasonably could believe he or she is under an official's control and is not free to leave. A place of detention is a police station, correctional facility, prisoner holding facility or another governmental facility where a person may be held in connection with a criminal charge.[14]
- Consent. The recording may be made without the consent or knowledge of, or despite the objection of, the individual being interrogated.[15]
- Access. On a discovery request the prosecutor must provide a copy of the recorded statement to defense counsel, or to an unrepresented defendant.[15]
- If no recording was made. An officer present may still testify about the statement if the court finds it otherwise admissible.[16] The jury is then told that it is the law of this state to record such statements and that it may consider the absence of a recording.[16]
The statute's definitions mean it does not reach an interview that is not custodial detention in a place of detention.[14]
Other requests that may come with the call
A polygraph
A defendant alleged to have committed first- through fourth-degree criminal sexual conduct or assault with intent to commit it must be given a polygraph examination if he or she requests one.[17] The statute speaks of a "defendant"; whether it gives a person who has not been charged an enforceable right to a test is not answered by the sources reviewed for this guide.[17] The Court of Appeals has said testimony about a defendant's polygraph examination is not admissible in a criminal prosecution.[18] See Polygraphs in CSC cases.
A phone or a DNA sample
A search conducted with consent is an established exception to the warrant and probable cause requirements, and when the person is not in custody the state must show the consent was voluntary and not the result of duress or coercion, express or implied.[19] Without consent, a warrant issues on a sworn affidavit and a finding of probable cause.[20] The DNA collection statute applies on arrest for a felony.[21] See Phone and computer searches and DNA evidence.
Conduct that is a separate crime
Some reactions to an investigation are themselves offenses. Michigan's laws on interfering with witnesses are described in the sister guide's page on witness tampering and intimidation. This guide's pages for people under investigation, Accused of a sex offense: first steps and Ten mistakes that make an investigation worse, cover the rest.
If you are the person who reported
A detective's call to the person named in a report is one step in the process described in How a sex-crime investigation works. A sexual assault victim may ask the investigating agency for the current status of the case and whether it has been submitted to the prosecuting attorney for review; the agency must answer if the information is available and disclosure would not impede or compromise an ongoing investigation.[22] Michigan's VOICES4 hotline can be reached by call or text at 1-855-864-2374.[23]
Common questions
Do police have to read Miranda rights before a phone call or a voluntary interview?
Miranda's warnings are required before custodial interrogation, meaning questioning after a person has been taken into custody or otherwise deprived of freedom of action in any significant way.[2][11] The opinion itself says general questioning of citizens in the fact-finding process is not affected by its holding.[3] Whether a particular interview was custodial is decided by a court on the facts.
Can what I say in a voluntary conversation with a detective be used in court?
The rules of evidence treat a party's own statement, offered against that party, as not hearsay.[4] Miranda states that volunteered statements of any kind are not barred by the Fifth Amendment.[3] Those rules say the statement is not excluded on those grounds; other rules of evidence and constitutional limits still apply to any particular statement.
Does a detective's interview have to be recorded?
Only in the setting the statute describes: a person in custodial detention, interrogated about a major felony.[5] Custodial detention means being in a place of detention such as a police station, under arrest or reasonably believing one is under an officer's control and not free to leave.[14] The recording may be made without the person's consent or knowledge.[15]
What happens if police did not record an interrogation they were required to record?
The statement is not automatically excluded. An officer who was present may still testify about it if the court finds the statement otherwise admissible, but the jury is instructed that Michigan law requires recording and that it may consider the absence of a recording in evaluating the evidence about the statement.[16]
Can I be charged if I never speak to the detective?
The charging decision belongs to the prosecuting attorney, whose signed authorization is needed before a warrant or summons can issue for anything other than a minor offense.[8] A statement from the accused is not a legal precondition: in criminal sexual conduct prosecutions the testimony of a victim need not be corroborated.[24]
Sources
- Const 1963, art 1, § 17 — Michigan Legislature
- Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436, 444 (1966) — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436, 477-478 (1966) — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- MRE 801(d)(2)(A) — Michigan Courts
- MCL 763.7(d); MCL 763.8(2) — Michigan Legislature
- MCL 763.7(d) — Michigan Legislature
- Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436, 473-474 (1966) — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- MCL 764.1(1) — Michigan Legislature
- United States v Lovasco, 431 US 783, 791 (1977) — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- MCL 722.628(2) — Michigan Legislature
- Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436, 479 (1966) — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- Const 1963, art 1, § 20 — Michigan Legislature
- MCL 763.8(1), (3) — Michigan Legislature
- MCL 763.7(a), (b), (f) — Michigan Legislature
- MCL 763.8(3), (5), (6) — Michigan Legislature
- MCL 763.9 — Michigan Legislature
- MCL 776.21(5) — Michigan Legislature
- People v Kahley, 277 Mich App 182, 183 (2007) — Michigan Courts
- Schneckloth v Bustamonte, 412 US 218, 219, 248-249 (1973) — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- MCL 780.651(1) — Michigan Legislature
- MCL 750.520m(1), (9)(d) — Michigan Legislature
- MCL 752.955 — Michigan Legislature
- State of Michigan, VOICES4 Hotline, "Sexual Assault" page; MDHHS, "Track-Kit for Survivors" — State of Michigan
- MCL 750.520h — Michigan Legislature
This page is general legal information about Michigan law, published by the office of Attorney Shawn Haff. It is not legal advice and reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Laws change and every case turns on its own facts — check the sources linked above and talk to a licensed Michigan attorney about your situation. If you are in danger, call 911. The National Sexual Assault Hotline is 1-800-656-4673.