● Available 24/7Arrested over the holidays? Read what happens nextHoliday OWI arrest? Start here2675 44th St SW #208, Wyoming, MI 49519
SHShawn HaffCriminal Defense Attorney
Call 616-438-6719Call Now
Call 616-438-6719

Michigan Legal Resource Library · The OWI offenses

Prescription and Over-the-Counter Drugs and OWI in Michigan

Key points

  • Michigan's OWI and OWVI offenses cover impairment by "a controlled substance, or other intoxicating substance," and the statute contains no exception for a drug taken under a prescription.[1]
  • "Controlled substance" includes everything on schedules 1 through 5, and schedules 2 to 5 are made up of substances with a currently accepted medical use.[2][3]
  • "Intoxicating substance" includes drugs recognized in the U.S. Pharmacopoeia and similar compendia, and non-food substances used in an unintended way that may cause intoxication.[4]
  • The "any amount" drug offense applies only to Schedule 1 substances and cocaine; for other medicines the prosecutor must prove the person was under the influence or visibly impaired.[5][6][7]
  • When an OWI or OWVI charge rests on a drug, the jury or judge generally must make a specific finding on that point, and a finding that a drug was involved is reported to the Secretary of State.[8][9]

In Michigan, a prescription does not change the legal test for impaired driving. The OWI offense in MCL 257.625(1)(a) and the visibly-impaired offense in MCL 257.625(3) apply to impairment from alcohol, "a controlled substance, or other intoxicating substance," and section 625 contains no exception for a drug taken as prescribed.[1] What matters is the drug's effect on the person's ability to drive.[10][11] At the same time, the "any amount" drug offense applies only to Schedule 1 substances and cocaine, so for most prescription medicines the prosecution must prove impairment, not just presence.[5][12][3]

Which drugs the OWI statute covers

Section 625 uses two drug categories, and between them they reach nearly any medicine that can affect driving.

  • Controlled substances. The Vehicle Code borrows the Public Health Code's definition.[13] That definition covers any drug, substance or immediate precursor in schedules 1 through 5.[2] Schedule 1 is for substances with a high potential for abuse and no accepted medical use in treatment in the United States.[12] Schedules 2, 3, 4 and 5 are, by their placement criteria, for substances with a currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States.[3]
  • Other intoxicating substances. This means a substance other than alcohol or a controlled substance that is recognized as a drug in the U.S. Pharmacopoeia, the Homeopathic Pharmacopoeia of the United States or the National Formulary, or a non-food substance, including vapors or fumes, used in a manner or for a purpose for which it was not intended and that may result in intoxication.[4]

The "other intoxicating substance" wording was added by 2012 PA 543, effective 31 March 2013; before that, the under-the-influence offense named only alcohol, controlled substances, or a combination.[14] Older web pages that describe only alcohol and "controlled substances" predate that change.

Presence versus impairment

Three main offenses can apply when a drug is involved, and they turn on different questions.

OffenseWhat must be shown about the drug
OWI, under the influence (625(1)(a))The person was under the influence of a controlled substance, another intoxicating substance, alcohol, or a combination[6]
OWVI, visibly impaired (625(3))The person's ability to operate was visibly impaired because of one of those substances[7]
Any amount (625(8))Any amount of a Schedule 1 substance or cocaine in the body, whether or not the driver was impaired[5]

Jurors in an under-the-influence case are told that the substance must have substantially lessened the person's ability to operate a vehicle in a normal manner; the person need not be falling down or hardly able to stand up.[10] For OWVI, they are told the person drove with less ability than an ordinary careful driver, lessened to the point another person would notice, and it is the ability to drive, not the manner of driving, that must be visibly lessened.[11] OWVI does not require proof of erratic driving; signs observed at the stop can be enough to send the charge to a jury.[15]

Because schedules 2 through 5 are not part of the "any amount" offense, a positive test for a medicine on those schedules does not by itself establish a section 625(8) violation.[5][3] The numeric limits in section 625(1) are alcohol-content limits, and the Vehicle Code sets no numeric threshold for THC.[6][16] Even for Schedule 1, the Supreme Court held that the inactive marijuana metabolite 11-carboxy-THC is not itself a Schedule 1 substance, and in 2021 reversed convictions resting only on an unidentified cocaine metabolite.[17][18]

How impairment by a drug is proved

The chemical-test provisions do not limit other admissible evidence on whether the person was impaired.[19] Jurors are told to consider the person's condition at the time of driving, including reflexes, vision, walking and talking, manner of driving and judgment, and whether any abnormality was caused by alcohol or drugs.[20] Blood and urine tests can show that a drug was present; the details are on blood tests in OWI cases.

Officers trained as drug recognition experts (DREs) are defined in the Vehicle Code as law enforcement officers trained to recognize impairment from a controlled substance rather than, or in addition to, alcohol.[21] In People v Bowden (2022), a DRE testified that the protocol has 12 steps and covers 7 drug categories; the Court of Appeals reversed an order letting the DRE testify about the degree of marijuana impairment, because the prosecution had not shown the protocol is validated for that purpose.[22][23] Bowden concerned marijuana; how courts treat DRE opinions about other drugs is decided case by case. See drug recognition experts and evidence in drugged-driving cases.

When an OWI or OWVI charge is based on a controlled substance or other intoxicating substance, the jury must return a special written verdict, or the judge must make a finding on a plea or bench trial, on whether the person was under the influence of or impaired by a drug; no separate verdict is needed when the jury is instructed to decide only the drug-based theory.[8][9] If the finding is that a drug was involved, the court reports it to the Secretary of State and forwards to the State Police a record of the penalties, which is kept as a public record for at least 7 years.[9][24]

Blood draws and medical conditions

The implied consent law covers tests of blood, breath or urine after an arrest for an OWI-type offense.[25] People with hemophilia, diabetes, or a condition requiring a prescribed anticoagulant are not considered to have consented to a blood draw.[26] Police can still seek a warrant for blood after a refusal.[27] See Michigan's implied consent law.

Penalties and license effects

A drug-based OWI carries the same criminal penalties as an alcohol OWI, and a 625(8) conviction is sentenced under the same subsection.[5] A first OWI with a drug carries the same 180-day license suspension as an alcohol OWI.[28] A first OWVI normally brings a 90-day suspension, but when the visible impairment was caused by a controlled substance, or by alcohol combined with one, the suspension is 180 days.[29] The penalty details are in first-offense OWI penalties and operating while visibly impaired.

The marijuana exception for registered patients

One narrow protection that resembles a "prescription defense" involves medical marijuana. Marijuana remains on Michigan's Schedule 1 list.[30] In People v Koon (2013), the Michigan Supreme Court held that the Medical Marihuana Act protects a registered patient who drives with marijuana in his or her system but is not otherwise under the influence, so the "any amount" rule does not apply to a patient who has not lost the act's immunity by failing to act in accordance with it.[31] The same act does not authorize anyone to drive under the influence of marijuana, and a registered patient can be prosecuted for OWVI.[32][33] Whether adult recreational users get similar protection is unsettled.[34] See marijuana and driving.

Practical point: pharmacy labels and package inserts may carry warnings about driving or operating machinery. Reading them, and asking the prescriber or pharmacist how a new medicine or a dose change may affect alertness, is a sensible step before driving.

Common questions

Is a valid prescription a defense to OWI in Michigan?

The statute does not provide one. Section 625(1)(a) and 625(3) apply to impairment from "a controlled substance, or other intoxicating substance," and no exception for prescribed use appears in section 625.[1] The question in those offenses is the effect of the drug on the person's ability to drive, as measured by the jury definitions of "under the influence" and "visibly impaired."[10][11]

Can I be charged for having my prescription in my blood even if I wasn't impaired?

The "any amount" offense in MCL 257.625(8) is limited to Schedule 1 substances and cocaine.[5] Schedule 1 is for substances with no accepted medical use in treatment in the United States.[12] For prescription drugs on schedules 2 through 5, the prosecutor proceeds under the under-the-influence or visibly-impaired provisions, which require proof of the drug's effect on the ability to drive.[3][10][11]

Do over-the-counter medicines count?

They can. The OWI statute covers an "other intoxicating substance," defined to include a substance recognized as a drug in the U.S. Pharmacopoeia, the Homeopathic Pharmacopoeia or the National Formulary, as well as non-food substances, including vapors or fumes, used in an unintended way that may cause intoxication.[4] That wording was added effective 31 March 2013.[14]

Does a drug-based OWI have different license consequences?

Sometimes. A first OWVI conviction normally brings a 90-day license suspension, but if the visible impairment was caused by a controlled substance, or by alcohol combined with one, the suspension is 180 days, with a restricted license still possible.[29] The court reports a drug finding to the Secretary of State.[24]

What about medical marijuana?

Marijuana is a special case. It is still a Schedule 1 substance under Michigan's Public Health Code.[30] The Michigan Supreme Court held in People v Koon (2013) that a registered medical marijuana patient is protected from the "any amount" rule but may still be prosecuted for driving under the influence.[31]

Sources

  1. MCL 257.625(1)(a), (3) — Michigan Legislature
  2. MCL 333.7104(3) — Michigan Legislature
  3. MCL 333.7213(b); MCL 333.7215(b); MCL 333.7217(b); MCL 333.7219(b) — Michigan Legislature
  4. MCL 257.625(25)(a) — Michigan Legislature
  5. MCL 257.625(8), (9) — Michigan Legislature
  6. MCL 257.625(1)(a)-(c) — Michigan Legislature
  7. MCL 257.625(3) — Michigan Legislature
  8. MCL 257.625(18)-(21) — Michigan Legislature
  9. MCL 257.625(20), (21) — Michigan Legislature
  10. M Crim JI 15.2(4) — Michigan Courts
  11. M Crim JI 15.3(4) — Michigan Courts
  12. MCL 333.7211 — Michigan Legislature
  13. MCL 257.8b — Michigan Legislature
  14. 2012 PA 543; 2008 PA 462 (MCL 257.625(1)(a) as enacted) — Michigan Legislature
  15. People v Mikulen, 324 Mich App 14, 17-24 (2018) — Michigan Courts
  16. MCL 257.625(1), (3), (8) — Michigan Legislature
  17. People v Feezel, 486 Mich 184, 204-212 (2010) — Michigan Courts
  18. People v Stock, 507 Mich 1008 (2021) — Michigan Courts
  19. MCL 257.625a(7) — Michigan Legislature
  20. M Crim JI 15.5(1) — Michigan Courts
  21. MCL 257.625t(6)(a) — Michigan Legislature
  22. People v Bowden, 344 Mich App 171 (2022) (slip op at 2) — Michigan Courts
  23. People v Bowden, 344 Mich App 171, 175 n 2, 189–191 (2022) — Michigan Courts
  24. MCL 257.625(18)-(22) — Michigan Legislature
  25. MCL 257.625c(1)(a) — Michigan Legislature
  26. MCL 257.625c(2) — Michigan Legislature
  27. MCL 257.625d(1) — Michigan Legislature
  28. MCL 257.319(8)(a) — Michigan Legislature
  29. MCL 257.319(8)(b) — Michigan Legislature
  30. MCL 333.7212(1), (2) — Michigan Legislature
  31. People v Koon, 494 Mich 1, 3, 7-9 (2013) — Michigan Courts
  32. MCL 333.26427(b)(4) — Michigan Legislature
  33. People v Dupre, 335 Mich App 126, 138-140 (2020) — Michigan Courts
  34. MJI Traffic Benchbook (4th ed) §9.11(E); MCL 257.625(8); MCL 333.7212(1)(c) — Michigan Courts

This page is general legal information about Michigan law, published by the office of Attorney Shawn Haff. It is not legal advice and reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Laws change and every case turns on its own facts — check the sources linked above and talk to a licensed Michigan attorney about your situation. In an emergency, call 911. For confidential help with alcohol or drug use, the SAMHSA National Helpline is 1-800-662-4357.

Facing charges? Don’t wait. Call now.

The sooner I’m involved in your case, the more options I have to protect you. The consultation is free, and I answer 24/7.