● Available 24/7Arrested over the holidays? Read what happens nextHoliday OWI arrest? Start here2675 44th St SW #208, Wyoming, MI 49519
SHShawn HaffCriminal Defense Attorney
Call 616-438-6719Call Now
Call 616-438-6719

Michigan Legal Resource Library · Records and long-term consequences

OWI, security clearances and military service

Key points

  • Under the national security adjudicative guidelines (SEAD 4, effective 8 June 2017), driving while under the influence is a listed alcohol-related incident that could raise a security concern.[1][2]
  • Failing to follow a court order about alcohol education, evaluation, treatment or abstinence is a separate listed concern.[2]
  • Mitigating conditions include the passage of time, acknowledging the problem with an established pattern of modified drinking or abstinence, and successful treatment.[3]
  • Adjudicators weigh the "whole person" and consider whether a clearance holder voluntarily reported the information; intentional falsification is of significant concern.[4][5]
  • Service members can be prosecuted for drunk driving under UCMJ Article 113, where the U.S. limit is the lesser of the state's limit or 0.08.[6]

An OWI can affect a security clearance. The guidelines contain no rule that a drunk-driving incident automatically disqualifies, but they also say a single area of concern may be enough for an unfavorable decision.[7] Under the national security adjudicative guidelines (Security Executive Agent Directive 4, effective 8 June 2017), "driving while under the influence" is a listed alcohol-related incident that could raise a concern, and the same guidelines list conditions that can mitigate it.[1][2][3] For service members, drunk driving is also a military offense under Article 113 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice.[6]

This page summarizes the published guidelines and the statute. It does not cover any agency's own reporting rules, service-specific regulations, or enlistment waivers, none of which were verified for this guide. A facility security officer, a command, or a lawyer who handles clearance or military matters can address a particular situation.

Which rules apply to clearance decisions

SEAD 4 sets the single, common adjudicative criteria for everyone who needs initial or continued eligibility for access to classified information or to hold a sensitive position, and it supersedes all earlier national security adjudicative guidelines.[1] An earlier alcohol guideline is still codified in federal regulations at 32 CFR 147.9, and it also lists driving while under the influence as a possible concern.[8]

Guideline G: alcohol consumption

The concern, in SEAD 4's words, is that excessive alcohol consumption "often leads to the exercise of questionable judgment or the failure to control impulses, and can raise questions about an individual's reliability and trustworthiness."[2]

Conditions that could raise a concern

The listed conditions include:[2]

  • Alcohol-related incidents away from work, "such as driving while under the influence", regardless of how often the person drinks or whether the person has been diagnosed with alcohol use disorder.[2]
  • Failure to follow any court order regarding alcohol education, evaluation, treatment or abstinence.[2]

The second item matters after an OWI conviction, because Michigan sentencing can include court-ordered treatment. For example, a high-BAC conviction or any OWI with a prior conviction requires a rehabilitative program of at least 1 year.[9] See the pre-sentence alcohol assessment.

Conditions that could mitigate the concern

SEAD 4 lists four mitigating conditions for alcohol:[3]

  1. So much time has passed, or the behavior was so infrequent or happened under such unusual circumstances, that it is unlikely to recur or does not cast doubt on current reliability, trustworthiness or judgment.[3]
  2. The person acknowledges a pattern of maladaptive alcohol use, shows actions taken to overcome it, and has a clear and established pattern of modified consumption or abstinence in line with treatment recommendations.[3]
  3. The person is in counseling or treatment, has no previous history of treatment and relapse, and is making satisfactory progress.[3]
  4. The person completed a treatment program with any required aftercare and has a clear and established pattern of modified consumption or abstinence in accordance with treatment recommendations.[3]

Guideline J: criminal conduct

An OWI is also a crime, so the criminal-conduct guideline can apply alongside Guideline G. Conditions that could raise a concern under Guideline J include a pattern of minor offenses that together cast doubt on judgment, evidence of criminal conduct whether or not the person was charged or convicted, being currently on probation or parole, and violating probation or failing to complete a court-mandated rehabilitation program.[10] This is why the end of probation, and completing every court-ordered program, can matter in a clearance review; see probation after an OWI and probation violations.

How adjudicators weigh the whole record

SEAD 4 calls adjudication a careful weighing of a sufficient period of a person's life, known as the "whole-person concept", with each case judged on its own merits.[4] Factors include the nature and seriousness of the conduct, its frequency and recency, the person's age and maturity at the time, the presence or absence of rehabilitation, and the likelihood of recurrence.[4] Any doubt is resolved in favor of national security.[4]

For someone who already holds eligibility, adjudicators consider whether the person voluntarily reported the information, was truthful and complete in answering questions, sought help and followed professional guidance, and has shown positive changes in behavior.[5] SEAD 4 also says intentional material falsification or purposeful non-cooperation with security processing is of significant concern.[5] The adjudicator also considers whether the person's eligibility should be suspended while the information is finally adjudicated.[7]

A common mistake is treating the OWI as the only issue. Under the guideline text, how the person reports and answers questions about it is also weighed.[5]

Military service: UCMJ Article 113

Article 113 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (10 USC 913) covers a service member who operates or is in actual physical control of any vehicle, aircraft or vessel while drunk, while impaired by a controlled substance, or with a blood or breath alcohol concentration at or above the applicable limit; the offense is punished "as a court-martial may direct".[6] In the United States the limit is the lesser of the state's limit or 0.08 grams per 100 milliliters of blood.[6] Michigan's OWI law likewise covers a bodily alcohol content of 0.08 or more, as well as being under the influence.[11]

The maximum military punishments for Article 113 are set in the Manual for Courts-Martial and were not verified for this guide.

Federal employment forms

The Declaration for Federal Employment (OF-306) asks whether, during the last 7 years, the applicant was convicted, imprisoned, or on probation or parole, including misdemeanors, and whether the applicant is currently under charges.[12] Applicants omit traffic fines of $300 or less and any conviction whose record was expunged under federal or state law.[12] The form does not say whether a Michigan set-aside counts as "expunged" for this purpose, so ask the hiring agency. See setting aside an OWI conviction.

Practical points

  • Find out from your security office or command what you are required to report, and by when, and write it down.
  • Keep proof of completed assessments, treatment, aftercare and probation discharge. These documents speak directly to the mitigating conditions above.
  • Answer every form and interview question about the incident accurately and completely.
  • For treatment and support options, see getting help for alcohol or drug use; for civilian jobs, see OWI and your job and OWI and professional licenses.

Common questions

Will a DUI cost me my security clearance?

No rule in SEAD 4 makes it automatic, though SEAD 4 says a single area of concern may be sufficient for an unfavorable decision.[7] SEAD 4 lists driving under the influence as a condition that could raise a concern and may be disqualifying, and it also lists mitigating conditions such as the passage of time and successful treatment.[2][3] Each case is judged on its own merits, and any doubt is resolved in favor of national security.[4]

Do I have to report an OWI arrest if I hold a clearance?

Reporting rules come from your agency or employer, which this page does not cover. SEAD 4 tells adjudicators to consider whether the person voluntarily reported the information and was truthful and complete, and it calls intentional material falsification of significant concern.[5] Ask your security officer what your agency requires.

Does a single OWI from years ago still matter?

It can be considered, but SEAD 4 lists as mitigating that so much time has passed, or the behavior was so infrequent or unusual, that it is unlikely to recur and does not cast doubt on current reliability.[3] The older federal guideline in 32 CFR 147.9 similarly lists incidents that do not indicate a pattern, or a problem that occurred years ago with no recent problem.[8]

Can a soldier be court-martialed for drunk driving off base?

Article 113 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice makes it an offense to operate or be in actual physical control of a vehicle, aircraft or vessel while drunk, impaired by a controlled substance, or at or above the applicable alcohol limit, punishable as a court-martial may direct.[6] In the United States the limit is the lesser of the state's limit or 0.08.[6] Whether a case is handled by civilian or military authorities depends on facts this page does not cover.

Does a federal job application ask about an OWI?

The Declaration for Federal Employment (OF-306) asks whether, in the last 7 years, you were convicted, imprisoned, or on probation or parole, including for misdemeanors, and whether you are currently under charges.[12] Applicants omit traffic fines of $300 or less and convictions expunged under federal or state law, and the form says that in most cases applicants can still be considered.[12]

Sources

  1. Security Executive Agent Directive 4, National Security Adjudicative Guidelines (eff. June 8, 2017), §§ B–C — dni.gov
  2. SEAD 4, Guideline G, ¶¶ 21, 22(a), 22(g) — dni.gov
  3. SEAD 4, Guideline G, ¶ 23(a)–(d) — dni.gov
  4. SEAD 4, Adjudicative Guidelines ¶ 2(a), (b), (d) — dni.gov
  5. SEAD 4, Adjudicative Guidelines ¶ 2(f), (i) — dni.gov
  6. 10 USC 913 (UCMJ art. 113)(a), (b)(1)(A), (b)(3) — Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
  7. SEAD 4, Adjudicative Guidelines ¶ 2(e), 2(f)(6) — dni.gov
  8. 32 CFR 147.9(b)(1), (c)(1)–(3) — Electronic Code of Federal Regulations
  9. MCL 257.625b(5) — Michigan Legislature
  10. SEAD 4, Guideline J, ¶ 31(a)–(d) — dni.gov
  11. MCL 257.625(1)(a)-(c) — Michigan Legislature
  12. OPM Form OF-306 (Revised October 2019), items 9 and 11 and instructions — opm.gov

This page is general legal information about Michigan law, published by the office of Attorney Shawn Haff. It is not legal advice and reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Laws change and every case turns on its own facts — check the sources linked above and talk to a licensed Michigan attorney about your situation. In an emergency, call 911. For confidential help with alcohol or drug use, the SAMHSA National Helpline is 1-800-662-4357.

Facing charges? Don’t wait. Call now.

The sooner I’m involved in your case, the more options I have to protect you. The consultation is free, and I answer 24/7.