Key points
- A driver who takes the officer's chemical test must be given a reasonable opportunity, within a reasonable time after detention, to have a person of his or her own choosing give one of the chemical tests.[1]
- The officer's advice of rights must include this right, and must also say the driver is responsible for getting the independent sample analyzed.[2]
- The Court of Appeals held that the right does not let a defendant pick a particular Michigan State Police analyst or force the State Police lab to retest its own evidence.[3]
- As written, the right belongs to a person who takes the police test; a person who refuses faces the separate refusal process instead.[1][4]
In Michigan, a driver arrested for OWI who takes the officer's breath, blood or urine test has a legal right to a second test given by a person of his or her own choosing. The law requires police to give "a reasonable opportunity" for that test "within a reasonable time after his or her detention," and the person charged is responsible for getting that sample analyzed.[1]
This page explains where the right comes from, what police have to say about it, what it does and does not include, and how it connects to the rest of the testing process. For the bigger picture of the post-arrest test, start with the implied consent law guide.
Where the right comes from
The right is in MCL 257.625a(6), the part of the Vehicle Code that governs evidential chemical tests. That is the post-arrest test given at the request of a peace officer who has reasonable grounds to believe the person committed one of the crimes listed in MCL 257.625c(1).[1] The list covers OWI and the related impaired-driving offenses, including operating while visibly impaired, the under-21 offense, child endangerment, the controlled-substance offense and commercial-vehicle OWI.[5]
The key sentence reads: "A person who takes a chemical test administered at a peace officer's request as provided in this section must be given a reasonable opportunity to have a person of his or her own choosing administer 1 of the chemical tests described in this subsection within a reasonable time after his or her detention."[1]
The independent test is different from the roadside preliminary breath test (PBT). The PBT is a screening test at the scene; the evidential test, and the independent test that follows it, belong to the post-arrest stage.[6][7] See the preliminary breath test guide for the roadside rules.
What the officer must tell you
A person arrested for a 625c(1) crime must be advised of five things.[8] The first three concern the independent test and the use of results:
- If the person takes a chemical test of blood, urine or breath given at a peace officer's request, he or she "has the right to demand that a person of his or her own choosing administer 1 of the chemical tests."[2]
- The results of the test are admissible in a judicial proceeding and will be considered with other admissible evidence in deciding innocence or guilt.[2]
- The person is responsible for obtaining a chemical analysis of a test sample obtained at his or her own request.[2]
- If the person refuses the officer's test, a test must not be given without a court order, but the officer may seek one.[8]
- Refusing will result in suspension of the license and 6 points on the driving record.[8]
The statute lists what the advice must cover; it does not prescribe exact wording or a form.[8]
What the right includes, and what it does not
One test, by someone you choose
The statute speaks of "1 of the chemical tests described in this subsection," meaning a test of blood, breath or urine.[1][2] The statute does not name who the chosen person must be. For comparison, when blood is drawn at a peace officer's request, only a licensed physician or a qualified person acting under a physician's delegation, in a medical environment, may withdraw it.[9]
The cost and the analysis are on the person charged
"If the person charged is administered a chemical test by a person of his or her own choosing, the person charged is responsible for obtaining a chemical analysis of the test sample."[1] The statute does not say that police arrange, pay for or analyze the independent test.[1]
Not a right to use the State Police laboratory
The Michigan State Police Toxicology Unit tests blood and urine for law enforcement agencies in every county from one location, the Lansing Laboratory.[10] In People v Green (2015), the Court of Appeals held that a defendant cannot choose a specific MSP forensic scientist to perform the independent test, because "the trial court lacks authority to compel a state agency to perform services it does not offer."[3] The same case held that the discovery rule, MCR 6.201(A)(6), does not let a court order the MSP to retest its own evidence; it only lets the court give the defendant the opportunity to test tangible physical evidence.[3][11]
Results of the independent test
Right after the independent-test sentence, MCL 257.625a(6)(d) says: "The test results are admissible and must be considered with other admissible evidence in determining the defendant's innocence or guilt."[1] The sentence does not say on its face whether it refers to the officer's test, the independent test, or both, and this guide does not interpret it. How any test result is offered at trial is covered in the guide to evidence in OWI cases.
People who refuse the police test
The statute's words give the independent-test opportunity to "a person who takes a chemical test administered at a peace officer's request."[1] A person who refuses enters a different track. No test may be given without a court order, but the officer may seek one.[4] The officer sends a written report to the Secretary of State and must give written notice of the right to request a hearing within 14 days of the notice.[12][13] For a non-commercial driver who does not request a hearing, the suspension is 1 year, or 2 years for a second or subsequent refusal within 7 years.[14] When blood is drawn under a search warrant, the implied-consent statute does not apply.[15]
Those rules are explained in the guides on refusing a breath or blood test and search warrants for blood draws.
What if the opportunity is not given?
The independent-test passage in MCL 257.625a(6)(d) states the right but, in the text quoted on this page, does not itself say what a court must do if a driver asked for an independent test and was not given a reasonable opportunity.[1] This guide has not verified Michigan appellate decisions on that question, so it does not describe a remedy. If the issue arises, it is a question for the judge in the particular case, raised through the motion process described in the guide to motions to suppress.
How the independent test fits with the rest of the evidence
A chemical test result is admissible and is presumed to be the same as the level at the time of driving.[16] Jurors are told they may infer that, and are also told to consider whether the test was technically accurate, whether the equipment was properly maintained, whether the test was given correctly and whether the person giving it was properly trained.[17][18] The testing statute also does not limit other admissible evidence about impairment or alcohol content.[19]
Blood drawn at a hospital for medical treatment after a crash follows its own rule: the analysis is admissible whether or not the person was offered or refused a police test, and the hospital must disclose results to a prosecutor who requests them.[20]
On a written request filed as the statute describes, the prosecution must furnish the police chemical-test results at least 2 days before trial, and failure to fully comply bars the prosecution from using them.[21] The discovery and video evidence guide covers the other records that can be requested.
Common misunderstandings
| Belief | What the law says |
|---|---|
| "Police must take me to a lab of my choice and pay for it." | The statute requires a reasonable opportunity; the person charged is responsible for obtaining the analysis.[1] |
| "I can make the State Police lab retest my blood." | Green held a court cannot compel the MSP lab to retest its own evidence or perform services it does not offer.[3] |
| "The independent test replaces the police test." | The right applies to a person who takes the police test; it is a second test, not a substitute.[1] |
| "Refusing the police test still gives me the independent-test right." | The statute ties the right to taking the police test; refusal leads to the court-order and suspension rules.[1][4][14] |
Practical points for keeping track
These are record-keeping steps, not legal requirements. Write down, as soon as possible, the time of arrest, the time and type of the police test, whether and when you asked for an independent test, what you were told, and the name of any facility or person who did a second test. Keep receipts and any lab paperwork. The documents to keep after an OWI arrest page lists the paperwork the process itself creates.
Common questions
Do I have to ask for the independent test right away?
The statute gives a reasonable opportunity to have the test done within a reasonable time after detention. It does not set a number of minutes or hours, so what counts as reasonable depends on the facts of the case.[1]
Who pays for an independent blood or breath test?
The statute puts responsibility for getting the independent sample analyzed on the person charged, and the officer's advice of rights says the same thing. The law read for this guide does not say the state pays for the analysis.[1][2]
Can I choose a State Police scientist to do my independent test?
No. In People v Green (2015), the Court of Appeals held that a defendant cannot choose a particular forensic scientist at the Michigan State Police laboratory, and that a trial court cannot order that lab to retest its own evidence; the court said a trial court lacks authority to compel a state agency to perform services it does not offer.[3]
If I refused the breath test, can I still get my own test?
The statute grants the independent-test opportunity to a person who takes a chemical test given at an officer's request. A refusal starts a different process: no test may be given without a court order, though the officer may seek one, and the refusal leads to a license suspension unless a timely hearing request succeeds.[1][4][14]
Can my lawyer test the police sample later?
Under the criminal discovery rule, the court may, on good cause shown, order that a party be given the opportunity to test tangible physical evidence without destroying it. In Green, the court described that rule as giving the defendant an opportunity to test evidence, not as power to make the State Police lab retest.[11][3]
Sources
- MCL 257.625a(6)(d) — Michigan Legislature
- MCL 257.625a(6)(b)(i)–(iii) — Michigan Legislature
- People v Green, 310 Mich App 249, 255–257 (2015) — Michigan Courts
- MCL 257.625d(1) — Michigan Legislature
- MCL 257.625c(1)(a) — Michigan Legislature
- MCL 257.43a — Michigan Legislature
- MCL 257.625a(2)(c) — Michigan Legislature
- MCL 257.625a(6)(b)(i)–(v) — Michigan Legislature
- MCL 257.625a(6)(c) — Michigan Legislature
- MSP Forensic Science Division, Toxicology — Michigan State Police
- MCR 6.201(A)(6), (C)(1)–(4) — Michigan Courts
- MCL 257.625d(2) — Michigan Legislature
- MCL 257.625e(1), (2) — Michigan Legislature
- MCL 257.625f(1)(a) — Michigan Legislature
- Manko v Root, 190 Mich App 702, 704 (1991); People v Perlos, 436 Mich 305, 313 (1990) — Michigan Courts
- MCL 257.625a(6)(a) — Michigan Legislature
- M Crim JI 15.5(6), (7) and Use Note 3 — Michigan Courts
- M Crim JI 15.5(2), (3) — Michigan Courts
- MCL 257.625a(7) — Michigan Legislature
- MCL 257.625a(6)(e); People v Perlos, 436 Mich 305 (1990) — Michigan Legislature
- MCL 257.625a(8) — Michigan Legislature
This page is general legal information about Michigan law, published by the office of Attorney Shawn Haff. It is not legal advice and reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Laws change and every case turns on its own facts — check the sources linked above and talk to a licensed Michigan attorney about your situation. In an emergency, call 911. For confidential help with alcohol or drug use, the SAMHSA National Helpline is 1-800-662-4357.