Key points
- A PPO can be issued ex parte when specific facts in a verified complaint, written motion, or affidavit clearly show that immediate and irreparable injury, loss, or damage will result from the delay needed to give notice, or that notice itself will precipitate adverse action.[1]
- The court must rule on a request for an ex parte order within one business day of the filing date of the petition.[2]
- An ex parte PPO is valid for not less than 182 days and takes effect when the judge signs it.[3][4]
- If the ex parte request is refused, the petitioner has 21 days from entry of the order to request a hearing before the denial becomes final.[5]
- The respondent may move to modify or terminate an ex parte PPO within 14 days after service or actual notice, and the court must schedule a hearing within 14 days after that motion is filed.[6][7]
An ex parte personal protection order (PPO) is one a judge issues without first notifying the person to be restrained. Michigan law allows it when specific facts shown by a verified complaint, written motion, or affidavit make it clearly appear that immediate and irreparable injury, loss, or damage will result from the delay required to give notice, or that the notice will itself precipitate adverse action before a PPO can be issued.[1] The court must rule on the request within one business day of the filing date of the petition.[2]
If you are in immediate danger, call 911. The National Domestic Violence Hotline is free and confidential, and it answers around the clock at 1-800-799-7233 or by texting START to 88788.[8]
This page covers the ex parte standard, what happens when the request is granted, what happens when it is denied, and what the respondent can do afterward. The filing steps themselves are in How to get a PPO in Michigan.
What does a petitioner have to show for an ex parte PPO?
Two things are in play. First, the petition has to meet the basic test for the type of PPO requested. For a domestic relationship PPO, that is reasonable cause to believe the respondent may commit one or more of the acts listed in MCL 600.2950(1).[9] For a nondomestic stalking PPO, the petition must allege facts that constitute stalking or the other conduct the statute covers.[10]
Second, the request has to satisfy the ex parte standard in MCL 600.2950(12), MCL 600.2950a(12), and MCR 3.705(A)(2).[1] That standard has three parts worth reading closely:
- Specific facts. The showing has to come from "specific facts," not conclusions.[1]
- A written showing. The facts have to be shown by a verified complaint, written motion, or affidavit.[1]
- Urgency tied to notice. The facts have to show either that immediate and irreparable injury, loss, or damage will result from the delay required to give notice, or that notice itself will precipitate adverse action before a PPO can be issued.[1]
The two statutes word the rule differently. MCL 600.2950(12) says a court "shall issue" an ex parte domestic relationship PPO if that showing is made. MCL 600.2950a(12), for the nondomestic types, says a court "shall not issue" a PPO ex parte "unless" the showing is made.[11]
In deciding whether reasonable cause exists for a domestic relationship PPO, the court must consider the testimony, documents, or other evidence offered, and whether the respondent has previously committed or threatened to commit a listed act.[12] The Court of Appeals has said that a respondent need not have already committed a listed act before an ex parte PPO is issued; the statute asks whether there is reasonable cause to believe the respondent may commit one.[13] A court also may not refuse a domestic relationship PPO solely because there is no police report, medical report, agency finding, or physical sign of abuse.[14]
The burden of proof is on the petitioner.[15] Practical guidance on describing incidents with enough detail is in Preparing a PPO petition.
How fast does the court act?
The court must rule on a request for an ex parte order within one business day of the filing date of the petition.[2] Whether the judge speaks with the petitioner before ruling, and how the paperwork moves between the clerk's office and the judge, varies from court to court.
If the ex parte PPO is granted
| Question | Rule |
|---|---|
| When does it take effect? | When the judge signs it; it is immediately enforceable anywhere in Michigan.[4] |
| How long does it last? | Not less than 182 days, and the order must state its expiration date.[3] |
| Does it have to be served to be valid? | No. Failure to serve the order does not affect its validity or effectiveness.[4] |
| Is it entered into LEIN? | Yes. The clerk files a copy with the designated law enforcement agency immediately and without proof of service, and the agency enters it into the Law Enforcement Information Network.[16] |
| What does it tell the respondent? | An ex parte order must state that the respondent may file a motion to modify or terminate it and request a hearing within 14 days after service or actual notice, and that motion forms are available from the clerk.[17] |
The petitioner is responsible for having the order served on the respondent, personally or by registered or certified mail with delivery restricted to the addressee, by an adult who is not a party.[18] If the respondent has not been served, a law enforcement officer or court clerk who knows of the order may serve it or tell the respondent about it at any time.[19]
Service still matters for enforcement. If police respond to a reported violation and the respondent has not received notice of the PPO, the respondent must be given an opportunity to comply before a custodial arrest; failing to comply immediately is grounds for arrest.[20]
A firearm restriction is part of an ex parte PPO only if the judge includes it.[21] How state licensing rules and the federal firearm statute treat orders issued with and without a hearing is explained in PPOs and firearms.
If the ex parte request is denied
A refusal is not the end of the case. Under MCR 3.705(A)(5), a court that refuses to grant an ex parte order must state the reasons in writing and advise the petitioner of the right to request a hearing. If the petitioner does not request a hearing within 21 days of entry of the order, the order denying the petition is final.[5]
The reasons have to be real ones. The Court of Appeals has said a conclusory determination that the allegations are "insufficient" for ex parte relief is not adequate for appellate review.[22]
When the petitioner requests a hearing, the court must schedule it as soon as possible, unless it determines after interviewing the petitioner that the claims are sufficiently without merit that the action should be dismissed without a hearing.[23][24] The rule gives no fixed number of days for this hearing.[24]
For the hearing, the petitioner must have the respondent served with the petition and the notice of hearing. One day before the hearing is deemed sufficient notice for a domestic relationship or nondomestic stalking petition; two days for a nondomestic sexual assault petition.[25] The hearing is on the record, and the petitioner must attend.[26] What happens there is described in What to expect at a PPO hearing.
A petitioner whose petition was denied can file again if something new happens. A second petition that repeats only the same allegations is barred, but after a new incident the court may consider the earlier incidents together with the new one.[27]
What can the respondent do about an ex parte PPO?
The respondent's hearing comes after the order, not before it. A respondent may file a motion to modify or terminate an ex parte PPO and request a hearing within 14 days after being served with, or receiving actual notice of, the order.[6] A motion filed later requires a showing of good cause.[28] There is no fee for the motion.[29]
The court must schedule a hearing on the motion within 14 days after it is filed. The period is 5 days if the PPO prohibits the respondent from purchasing or possessing a firearm and the respondent is in one of the occupations the statute lists, such as police officers and corrections officers.[7]
At a hearing on a motion to terminate or modify an ex parte PPO, the Court of Appeals has held that the burden of justifying continuation of the order remains with the petitioner.[30] Due process requires that the respondent be allowed to present evidence and to cross-examine.[31] The steps are in Served with a PPO: what to do and How to fight or terminate a PPO.
A PPO stays in force until it expires or a judge terminates it, so a violation while a motion is pending still exposes the respondent to arrest and criminal contempt.[32][33]
Why courts allow orders without notice
Respondents often ask how an order can be entered against them before they have said a word. The Michigan Court of Appeals has addressed that question and held that there is no procedural due process defect in obtaining an emergency order of protection without notice when the petition is supported by affidavits that demonstrate exigent circumstances and there are appropriate provisions for notice and an opportunity to be heard after the order is issued.[34] The motion to modify or terminate, and the hearing on it, are those provisions.[34][6]
What people get wrong
"An ex parte PPO is only a short placeholder." An ex parte PPO is valid for not less than 182 days and runs to the expiration date stated on it. The hearing the rules give the respondent is the one the respondent requests by motion.[3][6]
"The respondent has 21 days." The respondent's period is 14 days; the 21-day period is the petitioner's time to request a hearing after a denial.[6][5]
"Every respondent gets a hearing within 5 days." The general period is 14 days. The 5-day period in the statute applies only when the order prohibits firearms and the respondent is in a listed occupation.[7]
Common questions
What does ex parte mean in a PPO case?
It means the judge decides the request without written or oral notice to the respondent. Michigan law allows that only when specific facts in a verified complaint, written motion, or affidavit clearly show that immediate and irreparable injury, loss, or damage will result from the delay needed to give notice, or that giving notice will itself precipitate adverse action before a PPO can be issued.[1]
How quickly does a judge decide an ex parte PPO request?
MCR 3.705(A)(1) says the court must rule on a request for an ex parte order within one business day of the filing date of the petition.[2] If the order is granted, it is effective and immediately enforceable anywhere in Michigan once the judge signs it.[4]
Is it constitutional to issue a PPO without telling the respondent first?
The Michigan Court of Appeals has held that there is no procedural due process defect in an emergency order issued without notice when the petition is supported by affidavits showing exigent circumstances and there are appropriate provisions for notice and an opportunity to be heard after the order is issued.[34]
Does the respondent have 21 days to challenge an ex parte PPO?
No. The respondent's period is 14 days after being served with the order or receiving actual notice of it.[6] The 21-day period in the PPO rules belongs to the petitioner: it is the time to request a hearing after the court refuses an ex parte order.[5] A respondent who files after 14 days must show good cause.[28]
Can an ex parte PPO be appealed?
Under MCR 3.709(B), either party has an appeal of right from an order granting or denying a PPO after a hearing, or from the ruling on the respondent's first motion to rescind or modify an ex parte order. Appeals of all other orders are by leave to appeal.[35]
Sources
- MCL 600.2950(12); MCL 600.2950a(12); MCR 3.703(G); MCR 3.705(A)(2) — Michigan Legislature
- MCR 3.705(A)(1) — Michigan Courts
- MCL 600.2950(13); MCL 600.2950a(13); MCR 3.705(A)(3) — Michigan Courts
- MCL 600.2950(9); MCL 600.2950a(9); MCR 3.705(A)(4); MCR 3.706(D) — Michigan Legislature
- MCR 3.705(A)(5) — Michigan Courts
- MCR 3.707(A)(1)(b); MCL 600.2950(13); MCL 600.2950a(13) — Michigan Courts
- MCR 3.707(A)(2); MCL 600.2950(14); MCL 600.2950a(14) — Michigan Courts
- National Domestic Violence Hotline, thehotline.org (home page) — National Domestic Violence Hotline
- MCL 600.2950(4) — Michigan Legislature
- MCL 600.2950a(1) — Michigan Legislature
- MCL 600.2950(12); MCL 600.2950a(12) — Michigan Legislature
- MCL 600.2950(4)(a)–(b) — Michigan Legislature
- SP v BEK, 339 Mich App 171, 187 (2021) — Michigan Judicial Institute, Domestic Violence Benchbook
- MCL 600.2950(6) — Michigan Legislature
- Kampf v Kampf, 237 Mich App 377, 385–386 (1999); JLS v HRS, ___ Mich App ___ (2024) — Michigan Judicial Institute, Domestic Violence Benchbook
- MCL 600.2950(10), (15)(a), (19); MCL 600.2950a(10), (15)(a), (19); MCR 3.707(A)(3) — Michigan Legislature
- MCR 3.706(A)(1)–(7); MCL 600.2950(11); MCL 600.2950a(11) — Michigan Courts
- MCR 3.706(D); MCR 2.105(A); MCR 2.103(A); MCR 2.105(J); MCL 600.2950(18) — Michigan Courts
- MCL 600.2950(18); MCL 600.2950a(18); MCR 3.706(E) — Michigan Legislature
- MCL 600.2950(22); MCL 600.2950a(22) — Michigan Legislature
- MCL 600.2950(1)(e); MCL 600.2950a(3)(c), (26) — Michigan Legislature
- MCL 600.2950(7); MCL 600.2950a(7); MCR 3.705(A)(2), (A)(5), (B)(6); PC v JLS, 346 Mich App 233, 240, 243 (2023) — Michigan Courts
- MCR 3.705(B)(1); Lamkin v Engram, 295 Mich App 701, 709–710 (2012) — Michigan Judicial Institute, Domestic Violence Benchbook
- MCR 3.705(B)(1) — Michigan Courts
- MCR 3.705(B)(2) — Michigan Courts
- MCR 3.705(B)(3)–(5) — Michigan Courts
- PF v JF, 336 Mich App 118, 126–131 (2021) — Michigan Judicial Institute, Domestic Violence Benchbook
- MCR 3.707(A)(1)(b) — Michigan Courts
- MCR 3.707(D); MCR 3.704; MCR 3.708(B)(1); MCL 600.2529(1)(e) — Michigan Courts
- Pickering v Pickering, 253 Mich App 694, 698–699 (2002); HMM v JS, ___ Mich App ___ (2024); MCR 3.310(B)(5) — Michigan Judicial Institute, Domestic Violence Benchbook
- JLS v HRS, ___ Mich App ___ (2024); HMM v JS, ___ Mich App ___ (2024) — Michigan Judicial Institute, Domestic Violence Benchbook
- MCR 3.707(A)(1)(a) — Michigan Courts
- MCL 600.2950(23); MCL 600.2950a(23); MCL 764.15b(1)(c)(i); MCR 3.708(H)(5)(a) — Michigan Legislature
- Kampf v Kampf, 237 Mich App 377, 383–384 (1999); IME v DBS, 306 Mich App 426, 436–438 (2014) — Michigan Judicial Institute, Domestic Violence Benchbook
- MCR 3.709(B) — Michigan Courts
This page is general legal information about Michigan law, published by the office of Attorney Shawn Haff. It is not legal advice and reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Laws change and every case turns on its own facts — check the sources linked above and talk to a licensed Michigan attorney about your situation. If you are in danger, call 911. The National Domestic Violence Hotline is 1-800-799-7233.